Army Officer Evaluation Report measures an officer's ability to lead by example. It assesses an officer's work ethic, mentorship ability, physical fitness level, job competencies and character. The OER helps decide if your subordinate officers advance to higher ranks.
The OER helps decide if your subordinate officers advance to higher ranks. Senior reviewers take quick, decisive action when selecting officers for promotions. They briefly scan the OER and look for what stands out. You must write clear, concise and honest OERs.
Refer to this document often until you become comfortable with the OER structure. It covers the rating chain and time frames for submitting OERs and also explains the difference between rater, intermediate rater and senior rater.
In most cases, you will rate an officer who has been under your supervision for at least 90 days. The Structure The way the OER is designed, performance evaluations are graded on a "yes" or "no" scale. For example, you will be asked whether the officer "possesses desire, will, initiative, and discipline," and you will only be given a choice between yes or no.
This format helps selection committee members quickly separate stronger candidates from weaker ones. Once you evaluate the officer based on performance records and facts, you will decide whether he excels or falls short.
Then you will have room to make personal comments about your observations. The Boxes Approximately 16 blocks listing various officer responsibilities dominate the form.
The Written Content The Army wants specifics. If you marked "no" in a box, you have to explain in detail why.
This can be hard because you have limited space, so focus on the facts. The same applies to outstanding performance. You must justify through detail why you think an officer deserves an outstanding rating. Use tangible data when possible.
For example, if the officer is very fit, you can state, "Captain Doe achieved a score of on his latest PT test," instead of saying, "Captain Doe is in good shape. Three different forms will reflect the division of the officer rank structure: The Army designed the new system to improve the way it evaluates officers.David Howell Petraeus AO (/ p ɪ ˈ t r eɪ.
ə s /; born November 7, ) is a retired United States Army general and public official. He served as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency from September 6, , until his resignation on November 9, Prior to his assuming the directorship of the CIA, Petraeus served 37 years in the United States timberdesignmag.com last assignments in the Army.
Robert Yeomans. Longtime Alaska resident Robert Michael "Bob" Yeomans, 60, died of lung cancer 28 Oct 08, in Eagle River.
Bob was born 23 July , in Oakland, N.J., to James Guy Yeomans and Florence Evelyn Romaine. The U.S. Army Officer Evaluation Report measures an officer's ability to lead by example. It assesses an officer's work ethic, mentorship ability, physical fitness level, job competencies and character.
Revised Officer Evaluation Reports 1 APR 14 Implementation • Four separate evaluation reports based on grade: supplementary review will be performed by the first U.S.
Army officer above the Senior Rater in the organization or chain of supervision. Revised Officer Evaluation Reports 1 APR 14 Implementation OVERVIEW MOD 1. 2 supplementary review will be performed by the first U.S.
Army officer above the Senior Rater in . The written officer performance evaluation and assessment procedure makes clear and precise writing an indispensable and significant skill throughout the chain of command as officers are promoted based on written assessments regarding their performance.